Showing posts with label Stellan Skarsgard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stellan Skarsgard. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Cinema - Thor 3D

or: The superhero movie season has begun...


One word to sum it up: Dazzling.

Around four years ago, I saw a movie called Transformers. I was basically forced into the cinemas against my will, because I would have rather watched Will Ferrell's latest instead of some movies with cars that turn into big things and shoot things. I couldn't possibly think of anything more boring. However, when I came out of that cinema, I couldn't help but feel I'd had the best time of my life.
It was then, I fell in love with going to see big, loud, funny blockbusters at the cinema.
(yes, Michael Bay changed my life, don't judge me)
I've seen a few big blockbusters since then...The Dark Knight, Inception, TRON: Legacy, The A-Team...to name a few. But none had the same experience as that Bay picture ages ago. That was until I saw Thor. In only my second go at 3D, I was dazzled by the visuals yet engrossed by the story; laughing along with it yet enjoying the great performances; and just having a good time but not being sucked in by any of the big, dumb crap that you usually find in a blockbuster. No, it's not life-changing, but it's a bloody good time, just like Transformers was all those years ago.


I, like many people, was probably looking forward to this the least out of all the upcoming superhero flicks. A movie about a guy who throws a hammer around? Please. I could think of more exciting things on a worm farm. However, while we'll have to wait and see what Captain America and such do, I think this is a fine start to the season. Because, while this movie may have a hammer throwing Norse God (played by Chris Hemsworth) as the lead character, it's actually more exciting than my usual worm farm hangout. In fact, it's more of a human drama examining a fractured family, along with a guy who has come from the top of the ranks to being like us powerless creatures on Earth (just with a few more muscles). And, like always, there is a cute love story thrown in, between MC Hammer...woops, I mean Thor...and that crazy ballerina from Black Swan...woops, I mean Jane Foster (Natalie Portman). All in all, the story is actually quite good. I've always imagined what it would be like to be a Norse God coming to the abyss of our world.


We all know that Kenneth Branagh is a bit of a Shakespeare guy. And we all wondered whether the Shakespeare guy could make a highly-budgeted comic book movie. Yeah, I was a little bit sceptical, I'll admit. But Branagh did a brilliant job. Sure, there were a few niggles with his crooked angles and the fact that some of the action sequences were too dark to see in 3D. Branagh, however, may be more at home directing a blockbuster than other blockbuster specialist are themselves. He plays with the budget to get every intended effect that he wants, and there's that feeling that he did it out of true love, which is what many other blockbusters miss. I was surprised at how well he handled the mind-blowing action sequences. The early action sequences in the fantastic looking realm were superb, and definitely left me with little words to say other than "WHOA!"


Another thing I was sceptical about was the casting of Chris Hemsworth in the lead role. I know he was in Star Trek and whatever, but I'll always remember him as the hottie from Home and Away (a.k.a Australia's worst soapie) who was always in the teen mags I used to read. Here, he's piled on the muscles and put on a right majestic accent, and is virtually unrecognisable from those days. I quite liked his performance, it may not be earth-shattering, but he was actually really good. If I was expecting a flat performance, he certainly didn't give one of those. There aren't really any stand out performances here. Natalie Portman was pretty sweet in the love interest role, but that was pretty standard. Anthony Hopkins was barely in the thing but he was cool while he was around. Tom Hiddleston was pretty good as the villain in the family, and I can't wait to see more of this actor. Stellan Skarsgard was around for the ride too, and got a few funnies for himself. Kat Dennings got the most laughs, though, with her perfectly adequate depiction of generation technology. I liked it how a few of The Avengers crew decided to come to the party, reminding us that this is a part of something much bigger. Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg) popped up quite a few times, even referencing Tony Stark ("That guy never tells me anything!") while he was around. There were a couple of uncredited cameos from Samuel L. Jackson, in character as Nick Fury, and the brilliant Jeremy Renner, introducing his character of Hawkeye. That was a stroke of genius.


On a whole, Thor is a film which doesn't break barriers. There is that feeling that the film never really completes itself as it should, and I do admit leaving the cinemas feeling a bit empty. But hey, if someone had trouble with Iron Man 2, then this would be a much better film to go to. This one isn't as elaborate, and it doesn't have an overcooked amount of characters. Thor just sticks to simple storytelling, like having the main plot partly revolve around a family who doesn't really act like a family, and having the arrogant warrior stripped of his powers (the stuff of the fairytales I read as a child). It's a fun ride, yet it all means something. I imagine, if this film was a little bit longer, then it could have reached the epic heights it should have reached. Once the film ended, I wasn't sure of what I thought of the film. But as I walked out, someone waiting in the line for the next showing asked someone from my showing how they movie was. He said, with an enthusiastic voice: "Brilliant!"
At that moment, I realized I agreed wholeheartedly with that statement.

THE VERDICT: While Thor may not be as epic as it should be, it's an amazingly fun ride, packed with dazzling visuals, lots of wit and a brilliant human story. Let's just say: you may wanna see this instead of Kate Hudson's latest.

What I hoped for:







What I got:

Thursday, January 13, 2011

DVD--Boogie Woogie

or: Life imitating art.


One word to sum it up: Off-the-mark

No, Boogie Woogie isn't a musical sequel to Mamma Mia!, even if it does have Amanda Seyfried and Stellan Skarsgard in it. Rather, it will say it's one of those films which adopt multi plots so try and represent a certain happening (in this case, the London art scene). In reality, it's just all about sex. Because, allegedly, that is what art is, these days.

Directed by Duncan Ward, Boogie Woogie is a comedy of manners set against the backdrop of the London contemporary art scene. It begins with Elaine (Jaime Winstone), who is a video artist, trying to get her big break. Her friend Dewey (Alan Cumming) is desperately trying to help her, but when she uses Beth (Heather Graham) to get there, Dewey is hit hard. Beth works for an art buyer, Art (Danny Huston), who is trying to buy a painting entitled 'Boogie Woogie' off an ailing millionaire (Christopher Lee) and his wife (Joanna Lumley), but he has competition: Bob (Stellan Skarsgard) and Jean (Gillian Anderson) Maclestone. However, the bitter divorce that comes for Bob and Jean puts their entire art collection at stake, and the future of the 'Boogie Woogie' is put in jeopardy. Paige (Amanda Seyfried), the new assistant to Art, has an agenda of her own.

One of the things I really dislike about multi-plot films is that some stories seem to get lost among the more prioritized stories. Boogie Woogie seems to fall into this trap, but handles the several stories quite well, admittedly. What becomes the undoing of this film, though, is the weird, slightly warped, satirical view it has on the art scene. It's undoubtedly filled with many misrepresentations which come straight from the way Hollywood has built a stereotype for these types of people. This sees every single character in this movie trying to claw their way to the top, which is kinda annoying because there aren't any straight down-to-earth people. It's missing that right sense of balance, and doesn't really give you an indication of whether this is a film to be taken seriously or not. If you take it seriously, then it becomes quite an interesting ride through these horrible stock characters lives; even then, there are those moments which are telling you not to take it seriously, so it's easy to get confused.

The cast in Boogie Woogie is beyond fantastic, and their performances just about match that. They offer all that you could expect, but feel somewhat let down by the really bad cinematography and second rate script. There is one scene where Charlotte Rampling is telling Gillian Anderson about taking all she can get off her husband, which is simply fantastic. Unfortunately, the rest of the movie can't live up to that one scene, especially when it starts throwing sex around like a tennis ball and even tries to use shock value as a way to draw the viewer in. Luckily, it goes at a very fast pace, which is at least refreshing, and doesn't seem to dwell on one thing for very long.


THE VERDICT: Going at a fast pace with many characters, Boogie Woogie often gets lost in the message it's trying to convey, and proves too cynical for some.

4/10

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails