Friday, June 15, 2012

Dirty, Sexy Politics.

Film: The Ides of March
Year: 2011
Director: George Clooney
Written by: George Clooney, Grant Heslov & Beau Willimon, based on the play 'Farragut North' by Beau Willimon.
Starring: Ryan Gosling, George Clooney, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Paul Giamatti, Evan Rachel Wood, Marisa Tomei, Jeffrey Wright, Max Minghella, Jennifer Ehle.
Running time: 101 min.

Politics. They're one thing that I should have a strong stance on, but every time I hear about them, my brain switches off. I'm sure they're really interesting and all, but the only thing I think about before my brain switches off is how our government thinks it is okay to take money out of the education system, and they wonder why nothing good ever comes out of this place. It just confuses the crap out of me. One thing that confuses me even more is the way that American politics work. I could not tell you the first thing about American politics. So I guess that makes it seem like The Ides of March, George Clooney's latest directorial effort which is all about a presidential candidate's campaign trail, would not be a very good film for me. Admittedly, a bit of Ryan Gosling eased me into things, but The Ides of March was enough to not only get me a little more interested in the ins and outs of politics (only a little, though), but my eyes were opened to the stuff that may or may not be happening behind these smooth talking hot-shots who claim to have the right stuff for running a country.


What really grabbed my attention was the fact that this film wasn't entirely shown from the presidential candidate's (in this case, Governor Mike Morris, who is played by George Clooney himself) perspective. It is basically told from the perspective of an idealistic staffer, Stephen Meyers (Ryan Gosling), who is going along with Morris on his campaign trail but gets involved in some major disputes which could threaten to tear down Morris' perfectly built up persona that is going to get him that presidential role. Stephen is a very interesting character - at the beginning, he seems like your average guy who wants nothing but to see Morris win his campaign (even though he's against all odds), and all you see from him is work, work, work. But then he starts getting thrown around like the ball in a pinball machine. Here he realises that he is just the pawn in some big elaborate plan to tear someone else down, which brings out the cold and unfeeling side in him. Now I couldn't really tell if that mean streak was always in him before everything happened, but it was quite interesting to watch Stephen's descent into playing the dirty games that everyone else was playing. The only actor that could possibly do him justice is the amazing (and extremely good looking) Ryan Gosling. Last year was definitely his year, with a comedic turn in Crazy, Stupid, Love. and then the already iconic emotionless unnamed driver in Drive. However, while most will sway towards the Drive side, my favourite performance of his from last year was definitely his one in Ides. He played Stephen with the right mix of intensity and subtlety, leading to an ending that really makes you wonder what Stephen will do next.


Though I didn't personally have a problem with the finale - the ambiguity was just perfect - the events that preceded it seemed quite rushed. The movie slowly builds, and while it is tense for the most part, the over expository dialogue had my brain teetering on the edge of being interested in a film about politics and reverting to my former stance on politics being totally uninteresting. For all the events that happen in the movie, you kinda expect a bigger payoff, but it seems a bit like a cop out when it comes down to it all. A little bit of meat on the end would have worked nicely, and a bit more spice at the front could have balanced things out. However, when this movie really gets going, it really gets going. The most interesting thing, to me, was the story involving intern Molly Stearns (Evan Rachel Wood). She is the heart of the story, showing not only the possible devastating effects that politics can have on people, but the devastating effects that maintaining a smooth, flawless image for someone else who wants to succeed, on someone who just happens to be caught up in the middle of it. Wood's performance surprised me, because it was so restrained, which allowed it to really be as affecting as it was. That's another thing - this movie works with subtlety. It doesn't delve into melodrama, it just stays real. Because of that, this film could have been about anything, and even though it is about politics, it is extremely interesting to watch.


I'm really surprised that this only picked up a Best Adapted Screenplay Oscar nomination this year. While that was well deserved, I feel like this movie was a little short-changed. The film has a plethora of great stars who give great performances - especially Gosling, Clooney, Wood and the ever dependable Philip Seymour Hoffman - and Clooney also does a fantastic job directing it. To go along with that Alexandre Desplat's score is particularly memorable, the last thing that smooths down the slickness of it. While I can't see it being a major player in the future, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed this film now, and may even be persuaded to check out more like it.

What I got:





23 comments:

  1. Haha for me the title would be "How even Ryan Gosling could not get me interested in politics". It was a well made film and people acted well. But I was already so skeptical throughout the film that the final act was a big, albeit disinterested, "I told you so!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can totally see where you're coming from. The final act wasn't that great, unfortunately.

      Delete
  2. I think the only thing most people know about politics is that it's full of arseholes.

    The worst arseholes aren't even the ones who actually do politics, but the commentariat who think they're engaged in politics just because they've got a blog or newspaper column or talkback radio show, etc. And the worst arseholes among them are the ones who actually DO have some degree of clout with the arseholes who actually do politics, because the latter view them as being able to influence the arseholes in the world at large who listen to the arseholes in the commentariat to make them vote for or against the arseholes in politics.

    It's a good thing so few people really care about politics, because if more people actually gave a shit they'd realise just what sort of arseholes do politics, and the streets of the cities of the world would be full of the corpses of politicians hanging by piano wire around their necks from lamp posts.

    And this is why you should never get me started on politics, cos I start going on like a complete arsehole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, I totally agree with everything that you've said.

      Delete
  3. So glad you liked it, Stevee! I too think this is best work from Gosling from last year, he plays such a douche but he make him seem not just beliavable but also likable. Also comparing to other people in the film he really doesn't come off that bad, but the longer he stays in this world, the less soul he has. I love Wood's performance here I like seeing her in roles like that where she isn't aggressive and flashy, but very human instead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd love to see what happens to Stephen afterwards, but I imagine he's gonna end up self-destructing. Wood was really good here - I agree, she was very human, which is something that I haven't got from her work yet.

      Delete
  4. I saw it in the theater last year and even though a tad predictable, I certainly enjoyed it for all the performances and even Clooney's direction and I am not all that apathetic to politics, so maybe even that helped to keep me interested. So, whatever may be the reason but I agree with almost all your points.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to wonder what it was like for someone who knows a thing or two about politics. Would be interesting to see how it holds up then.

      Delete
  5. Glad you enjoyed The Ides of March Stevee. It's a well made movie and while political thriller are usually about as thrilling as watching paint dry, I really quite enjoyed this. Great cast and tight script.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Political thrillers can be extremely boring, but not this one!

      Delete
  6. I enjoyed the film in the theater but haven't felt an interest to plug in the DVD. I think "lack of likeable characters" might have something to do with it.

    If you ever need more films that will make you dislike watching politics, 1964's THE BEST MAN (with Henry Fonda vs Cliff Robertson) should make you feel like you've been rolled around in a barnyard. And if you ever fear that it's only national politics that are loathesome, there's Spencer Tracy's 1958 THE LASH HURRAH tha gives a good highlighting to provincial political machinery, too. Pull the 'loo handle - flush 'em all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, there's a definite lack of likeable characters here. I've been known not to mind that. And I'll try check those ones out!

      Delete
  7. I haven't seen this yet and I'm looking forward to it. I actually do enjoy politics, and this movie is incredibly full of acting talent. The only question is "why haven't I seen it yet?" :-) Your review convinced me that while this may not be one of the greatest films of all time, I won't be disappointed. By the way I LOVE your rating system.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why haven't you seen it yet? Haha. It's really good. And thank you :)

      Delete
  8. I will definitely try to get around to watching this

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am extremely impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout
    on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
    Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it's rare to see a great blog like this one today.
    Also visit my web page :: Dubai Law Firms

    ReplyDelete
  10. "But then he starts getting thrown around like the ball in a pinball machine." <- THAT is correct. A crisp review. Check out my own take on the film. I loved it a lot more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely will check out your take!

      Delete
  11. I truly am certain that these “leaders’” sole purpose is winning a presidential election. There is no evidence to support the contrary. guarantor loans

    ReplyDelete
  12. Me and my companions have completely appreciated this blog.
    Joseph Hayon

    ReplyDelete

You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails