Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 22, 2013
Do You Hear the People Sing?
Les Miserables (2012) / UK / Out in cinemas now / Directed by Tom Hooper / Written by William Nicholson, based on the musical by Claude-Michel Schonberg and Alain Boublil and the novel by Victor Hugo / Starring Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried, Eddie Redmayne, Samantha Barks, Aaron Tveit, Sacha Baron Cohen, Helena Bonham Carter / 157 mins
Les Miserables is a tough egg to crack. For any newbies, going along for a quiet Tuesday matinee of Tom Hooper's film adaptation might find themselves a little disconnected, jaded by the amount of topics it burns through and wondering how people got to be where they are. I am one of those people who are a Les Miserables 'veteran'. A couple of years back, I did the make-up for the stage production that was in town. This was a huge deal for Dannevirke, since the cast could probably be made up of our entire population, the budget was high and we were putting on one of the most professional productions this town has ever seen. While I never actually got to see the production on stage as I spent most of my time backstage, I'd seen enough rehearsals and heard enough of the songs to have them etched into my memory. Going into Les Mis, I was in the mindset that I'd love it - to be honest, this was another one of those War Horse cases but since the end of my blogging is nigh I won't be defending it quite as vociferously - and I did. That's because I knew what the story involved. People must bear in mind that the book is over 1000 pages long, and then the musical is over 3 hours long. So condensing this enormous story with lots going on into a cinematic spectacle for a modern audience was always going to be difficult, and it succeeds, for the most part - probably just for us Les Mis fans.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
A Conversation with Real Steel
Hey hey, here's a movie which I actually liked! This will present a little bit of a challenge, since I've been quite used to conversing with films that I didn't really like. Anyway, I welcome this - and hopefully you will too.
Do I really need to explain what 'a conversation' post is again? Newbies, go here. Let's hope to some Real Steel, guys!
CHRISTOPHER: After being told last week by Immortals that I was a little too pale, I've decided to revert my attention back to robots. I guess they're a lot less judgemental...
REAL STEEL: What you mean to say is boxing robots.
C: Sorry, boxing robots.
RS: We don't just have any robots.
C: So they're not like the robots you'd find in a Michael Bay film?
RS: No. I'm a movie with an actual heart beating through it, which is what robots were intended to be in.
C: Fair enough. So what else sets you apart from the average Michael Bay robotic flick?
RS: Uh, Hugh Jackman being awesome. A female counterpart that isn't just there to look good and do nothing else. Maybe an actual storyline.
C: What is your storyline?
RS: Imagine your average sports movie. Now set it in the future. Instead of people boxing, have robots boxing. And then have Hugh Jackman train them. See where I'm going here?
C: So basically, it is a sports movie with boxing robots.
RS: ....and Hugh Jackman.
C: And Hugh Jackman. Does he sing in this movie?
RS: No, unfortunately not.
C: So it can't be a great deal too memorable, then.
RS: BUT WE HAVE BOXING ROBOTS!
C: I guess so. If you ask me, boxing robots sounds like an iffy premise.
RS: So does basing a film on a board game. But this kind of stuff happens.
C: So does that mean that Battleship will actually be good?
RS: It doesn't look like it follows the source material as it should. I don't remember seeing aliens when I had a couple of robots play the board game in an early edition of the script.
C: Boxing was the best you could come up with?
RS: For now, yeah. Don't worry, someone will 'reboot' me in a few years and we'll have robots participating in 'the hunger games'.
C: Sounds like a plan.
RS: Robots are so hot right now.
C: So you said that you actually have a beating heart running through you. How's that?
RS: Everyone loves an 'underdog triumphs' story, don't they? I am one of those. And I don't skip on the heart. Atom the robot and his bond with young Max is truly inspiring. You know, like that movie War Horse? Actually, maybe, if they want to reboot a reboot of me, they can have Atom go off to war and Max try and find him. Write that down.
C: Mhm...you sound like you're quite rebootable.
RS: Reboot and robot sound just about the same.
C: But will people get their money's worth with just you, the original boxing robot movie?
RS: Of course. But then they'll want to go out and buy a boxing robot to keep as a pet, and that ain't to easy on the pocket.
C: I'm sure that watching you and buying a boxing robot is more satisfying than watching a Michael Bay movie, though.
RS: As real as steel, mate.
What I got:
Do I really need to explain what 'a conversation' post is again? Newbies, go here. Let's hope to some Real Steel, guys!
CHRISTOPHER: After being told last week by Immortals that I was a little too pale, I've decided to revert my attention back to robots. I guess they're a lot less judgemental...
REAL STEEL: What you mean to say is boxing robots.
C: Sorry, boxing robots.
RS: We don't just have any robots.
C: So they're not like the robots you'd find in a Michael Bay film?
RS: No. I'm a movie with an actual heart beating through it, which is what robots were intended to be in.
C: Fair enough. So what else sets you apart from the average Michael Bay robotic flick?
RS: Uh, Hugh Jackman being awesome. A female counterpart that isn't just there to look good and do nothing else. Maybe an actual storyline.
C: What is your storyline?
RS: Imagine your average sports movie. Now set it in the future. Instead of people boxing, have robots boxing. And then have Hugh Jackman train them. See where I'm going here?
C: So basically, it is a sports movie with boxing robots.
RS: ....and Hugh Jackman.
C: And Hugh Jackman. Does he sing in this movie?
RS: No, unfortunately not.
C: So it can't be a great deal too memorable, then.
RS: BUT WE HAVE BOXING ROBOTS!
C: I guess so. If you ask me, boxing robots sounds like an iffy premise.
RS: So does basing a film on a board game. But this kind of stuff happens.
C: So does that mean that Battleship will actually be good?
RS: It doesn't look like it follows the source material as it should. I don't remember seeing aliens when I had a couple of robots play the board game in an early edition of the script.
C: Boxing was the best you could come up with?
RS: For now, yeah. Don't worry, someone will 'reboot' me in a few years and we'll have robots participating in 'the hunger games'.
C: Sounds like a plan.
RS: Robots are so hot right now.
C: So you said that you actually have a beating heart running through you. How's that?
RS: Everyone loves an 'underdog triumphs' story, don't they? I am one of those. And I don't skip on the heart. Atom the robot and his bond with young Max is truly inspiring. You know, like that movie War Horse? Actually, maybe, if they want to reboot a reboot of me, they can have Atom go off to war and Max try and find him. Write that down.
C: Mhm...you sound like you're quite rebootable.
RS: Reboot and robot sound just about the same.
C: But will people get their money's worth with just you, the original boxing robot movie?
RS: Of course. But then they'll want to go out and buy a boxing robot to keep as a pet, and that ain't to easy on the pocket.
C: I'm sure that watching you and buying a boxing robot is more satisfying than watching a Michael Bay movie, though.
RS: As real as steel, mate.
What I got:
Saturday, July 9, 2011
The X-Men Trilogy - X-Men, X2: X-Men United, X-Men: The Last Stand
Yes, I was one of the ones who watched X-Men: First Class before seeing the rest. But you know how much I love Nicholas Hoult. In fact, I actually watched X-Men Origins: Wolverine before I watched the rest. This was like two years ago, and I can't offer an explanation as to why I chose that one first. So I finally decided that I'd pick up the actually trilogy (which we only just got at the shop...useless or what?), and give them a mini-review each.
X-Men
I'm a big fan of finding out how people came to be who they are. Sure, this was done, to a degree, in X-Men: First Class. In fact, when this began with the exact same concentration camp scene, I thought I was in for something similar. But no, instead of that stylish 60's theme, we have a movie that comes to the start of the big mutant/human fiasco, and we have one of those typical comic book movie themes. It's shiny, filled with lots of action and basically everything I hoped to see from a movie made in 2000 (I'm uneasy about this year...I have no idea why). Here, the audience, along with Wolverine (Hugh Jackman) and Rogue (Anna Paquin), is introduced to the school that Professor Xavier (Patrick Stewart) has created for mutants with special powers. And through this, we are introduced to the disagreement between Magneto (Ian McKellen), who thinks that humans and mutants could never co-exist, and Xavier, who believes they can. Now this is the kind of story that begs for a sequel, in order to fully understand this war and get the rather large cast all sorted out. This film does really well at introducing the several characters without allowing them to become two-dimensional. It requires a bit of work to do this, but I didn't really mind at all. To back this up there were some good visual effects that never became too cheesy, and it was frequently funny as it was thrilling. All in all, it was a solid start to the series - probably my favourite in the trilogy. That's probably because I'm big on having character dynamics actually working.
What I got:
X2: X-Men United
A lot of people like this entry the most, and I don't blame them. The mutants come back, and they're bigger and meaner. Plus, now the characters are all set-up nicely, they can just have an all out action flick with nothing else to worry about. However, one of the reasons why I didn't like this movie as much is because I felt it was too long. And with that came the unnecessary amount of loudness. That's not all that bad, though, because in it's longness and loudness, there are some great action sequences, a really good story and some really good acting - which is sometimes a rarity in such big action ensembles like this. The climax was exceptional and definitely rewarding, which makes you think that the series probably would have been right without a sequel. But in the last few moments, the film begs for a sequel, with a question that really can't go unanswered. This could be perceived as one of the film's biggest downfalls. Despite that, X2 is mammoth entertainment, with many layers providing enough to have a fully enriching time with a superhero movie. Even if the idea of trying to exterminate all mutants is really just a stupid idea to begin with.
What I got:
X-Men: The Last Stand
Well, everyone pretty much hates this one. Me? I didn't see what was so wrong with it. I actually enjoyed it just as much as any of the other ones, and thought it was a fitting end to the trilogy. However, the flaws are as plain as the nose on Owen Wilson's face. Brett Ratner replaced Matthew Vaughn who replaced Brian Singer in the directing job. First of all, had Singer continued, he would have had a really great trilogy. Matthew Vaughn did phenomenally well with X-Men: First Class. Ratner? He got a bit trigger happy. Instead of having the heart and emotion of the last two, this film is angry and through that anger comes lots of action...that pretty much doesn't mean anything. It wasn't done with the love that Singer had for the project. The story was very simple compared to the other two at well, further pushing it's status as a brainless blockbuster. Another thing that the film did wrong was having Olivia Williams play Moira MacTaggert for all of a minute. You don't just have Olivia Williams in a film for a minute...because that becomes both the highlight and the great disappointment of this film. However, with all it's flaws, I still enjoyed it enough. It was cool being introduced to some more characters, even if they were severely underdone (like Beast, whose makeup was simply atrocious). I can't decide whether I liked the way Jean Grey was changed from such a good person to that evil force...it seemed really strange and misplaced, but Famke Janssen was really good in her bad side. So yeah, I didn't love this entry like I did the others, but I didn't hate it, as everyone else did.
What I got:
And here's my ranking of all the X-Men movies:
1) X-Men: First Class
2) X-Men
3) X2: X-Men United
4) X-Men: The Last Stand
5) X-Men Origins: The Last Stand
What do you think of the X-Men trilogy? What's your favourite out of the lot?
X-Men
What I got:
X2: X-Men United
A lot of people like this entry the most, and I don't blame them. The mutants come back, and they're bigger and meaner. Plus, now the characters are all set-up nicely, they can just have an all out action flick with nothing else to worry about. However, one of the reasons why I didn't like this movie as much is because I felt it was too long. And with that came the unnecessary amount of loudness. That's not all that bad, though, because in it's longness and loudness, there are some great action sequences, a really good story and some really good acting - which is sometimes a rarity in such big action ensembles like this. The climax was exceptional and definitely rewarding, which makes you think that the series probably would have been right without a sequel. But in the last few moments, the film begs for a sequel, with a question that really can't go unanswered. This could be perceived as one of the film's biggest downfalls. Despite that, X2 is mammoth entertainment, with many layers providing enough to have a fully enriching time with a superhero movie. Even if the idea of trying to exterminate all mutants is really just a stupid idea to begin with.
What I got:
X-Men: The Last Stand
Well, everyone pretty much hates this one. Me? I didn't see what was so wrong with it. I actually enjoyed it just as much as any of the other ones, and thought it was a fitting end to the trilogy. However, the flaws are as plain as the nose on Owen Wilson's face. Brett Ratner replaced Matthew Vaughn who replaced Brian Singer in the directing job. First of all, had Singer continued, he would have had a really great trilogy. Matthew Vaughn did phenomenally well with X-Men: First Class. Ratner? He got a bit trigger happy. Instead of having the heart and emotion of the last two, this film is angry and through that anger comes lots of action...that pretty much doesn't mean anything. It wasn't done with the love that Singer had for the project. The story was very simple compared to the other two at well, further pushing it's status as a brainless blockbuster. Another thing that the film did wrong was having Olivia Williams play Moira MacTaggert for all of a minute. You don't just have Olivia Williams in a film for a minute...because that becomes both the highlight and the great disappointment of this film. However, with all it's flaws, I still enjoyed it enough. It was cool being introduced to some more characters, even if they were severely underdone (like Beast, whose makeup was simply atrocious). I can't decide whether I liked the way Jean Grey was changed from such a good person to that evil force...it seemed really strange and misplaced, but Famke Janssen was really good in her bad side. So yeah, I didn't love this entry like I did the others, but I didn't hate it, as everyone else did.
What I got:
And here's my ranking of all the X-Men movies:
1) X-Men: First Class
2) X-Men
3) X2: X-Men United
4) X-Men: The Last Stand
5) X-Men Origins: The Last Stand
What do you think of the X-Men trilogy? What's your favourite out of the lot?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)